Post Termination Allegations of Misconduct: Employers – Think Twice!
By: Esra YacoutAfter-acquired cause is misconduct that is discovered only after an individual’s employment has ended. If this misconduct had been identified before termination, it could have justified a termination for cause. After-acquired cause can be a legitimate defense if raised in good faith.
However, the recent case of Hoem v. Macquarie Energy Canada Ltd, 2025 BCSC 446, provides us with an example of how improper allegations of after-acquired cause can backfire.
The Court Decision
Mr. Hoem was terminated without cause and received a severance package. He subsequently filed a lawsuit against his employer, claiming he was entitled to a larger severance amount. In defense of the lawsuit, the employer raised the argument of after-acquired cause, citing misconduct discovered after termination, which included consuming cannabis at work, dishonesty, and releasing confidential information.
The court rejected the employer’s claim of after-acquired cause and found that Mr. Hoem’s dishonesty was about matters unrelated to his job. This did not justify cause for termination. The court also concluded that Mr. Hoem had taken CBD for health reasons and there was no violation of the employer’s drug policy.
The court found that several allegations made by the employer were taken to trial even though they lacked supporting evidence. Additionally, although the allegation that Mr. Hoem had released confidential information was withdrawn before trial, the court determined that it should never have been made in the first place as there was no reasonable basis for it
The continued pursuit of unfounded claims, particularly those that could damage the employee’s professional reputation, was found to be a breach of the employer’s duty of good faith. The court awarded Mr. Hoem $35,000 in aggravated damages.
Key Takeaway for Employers
After-acquired cause is not a fallback option to justify a past termination. Employers must ensure any allegations are well-founded. Pursuing unsubstantiated claims can backfire, undermining the employer’s defense and exposing them to additional damages.
For more information about this case, or if you require legal advice in relation to an employee termination or a wrongful dismissal claim, please contact any member of our Employment and Human Rights Group
-
Is it appropriate to make surreptitious recordings in the workplace, so long as one party to the conversation consents? According to a recent BC Supreme Court decision, the answer is “No”. In Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, the Court found that Mr. Shalagin’s conduct in surreptitiously recording his colleagues constitutes just cause given the effect of the relationship of trust. The employee knew his actions were wrong, if not legally, at least ethically.
-
The practice of adopting vaccine mandates for employees in BC has advanced considerably from where we were even a couple of months ago. While there have been no changes in the applicable legislation (for example, no amendments to the BC Employment Standards Act, the BC Human Rights Code or the Workers Compensation Act to explicitly permit employer vaccine mandates), a large number of employers have now moved forward with implementing a vaccine mandate.
